This page has been validated.
2
TIKTOK INC. v. GARLAND
Opinion of Sotomayor, J.
orating with certain entities regarding its “content recommendation algorithm” even following a qualified divestiture. §2(g)(6)(B), 138 Stat. 959. And the Act implicates content creators’ “right to associate” with their preferred publisher “for the purpose of speaking.” Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U. S. 47, 68 (2006). That, too, calls for First Amendment scrutiny.
As to the remainder of the per curiam opinion, I agree that the Act survives petitioners’ First Amendment challenge.
