successfully attacked the city April 30 and May 1.[1] Disaffection on the part of Burgevine's partisans in the army necessitated a return to Sungkiang, where Gordon reorganised the force, making a number of changes among the officers. With this new group Gordon marched forth to the siege of K'unshan (Quinsan) and arrived before the walls on May 27. His force now amounted to 600 artillerymen and 2,300 infantry.[2] The use of his "amphibious steamer," Hyson, greatly accelerated the capture of this city which, with the help of General Ch'en, fell on June 1.[3] Ch'en's claim for a great share of the credit, the fact that Gordon had ignored Ch'en's strategic suggestions, and the latter's jealousy over the successes achieved by the Hyson and by Gordon's strategy in taking the city, brought about serious friction between them, the rupture becoming so deep that Governor Li and Sir Halliday Macartney had to intervene. Trouble also arose because of the determination of Gordon to make K'unshan his base instead of Sungkiang, bringing on a mutiny repressed by stern measures.[4] From this time more formal army discipline prevailed than had been the case heretofore. But this was not accomplished without a third mutiny, which was settled by compromise.[5]
Many causes now conspired to lead Gordon to resign his command: friction with his men and with General Ch'en, the tardy settlement of legitimate claims,[6] and
- ↑ Morse, II, 94 f.; Wilson, pp. 150 f. The author finds in this incident at Taitsang the cause and justification for the murder of the surrendered wangs at Soochow by order of Li Hung-chang.
- ↑ Morse, II, 95; Wilson, p. 158.
- ↑ Wilson, pp. 159-182. Chinese sources give the date as May 31.
- ↑ Hake, pp. 260-282; Wilson, pp. 164 f.
- ↑ Wilson, pp. 166 ff.
- ↑ Here a study of the financial situation of the governor is necessary. With claims from Tsêng Kuo-fan and his own men, did apathy or poverty lead him to spar for time? Hake states that Gordon actually resigned July 25 and publishes his letter to Li Hung-chang.
