256 Cases ruled and adjudged in the r796. unfupported by any precedent: But, I am the more {trengtlp tran; in my opipion, as not a lingle authoritative diétum is to - e ound again it. - Ynrss, gijliu :-Concnrred. · _ ful? T1-ts pour :-Le: judgment be entered for the plaintiff} amages, m , an c Rnsivunuca wr/'ur Nrcrsotsau. _ l 'I*l·lCI§ caufe had been removed by writ of Error, into the High _ urt of Errors and Appeals and the judgment bci there ailirmed, it was remitted to this,Court. On motiori of ITE gzrfall, for the Commonwealth, it was ruled. Br me Conrrr, That in all cafes, where judgments were allirmed upon writs of Error, the Execution may include the _ intereilc, from the dateof the judgment. ‘ cOA’I7ES’S Lelfee wrfu Haurrsrou. Y rniltalre the demife hadbeen laid in the declaration, fo E as to commence before the death of the perfon, whofe . eath gave rife to the controverfy. Ingerftll, therefore, moved ~_ for leave to amend the declaration, by reélifying this miltalte. Br Tun Comer :—Let the amendment be made. Z Hnuus rmjiu 1I.mnevu.L1=:; U qq HE plaintiff and defendant were both Brityb fubjeéls ; the 6, ’ debt, for which the prcfent aétion was brought, had been if 3. contrafted in England ; and the defendant, before the fuit was _ 355, inllituted, had obtained his certificate under a commilliou of 36 6 bankrupt illhed againlt him in that country. _ ' Under thefe circumflances, Heath obtained: rule to lhew § caufe why an exorurztur fhould not be entered on the bail piece ; _ and in fupport of the rule cited 4 Term. Rep. 182.- Co. Bank. Law- 497- · . Eliglvman declined oppoling the rule, being of opinion, _that between Brityl: fubjeéts, the proceedings under a Briti% com- million of bankrupts mult be valid and obligatory. ile faid, that it had been fo decided by liutmtu., _Zz_Jlire, in the Circuit . Court, for the Dillriét of JlIq[In·}::y2tt.r ;"‘a ut, at the fame tha; f In Gmmrgb v. Emmmy. `
�
