209 U.S. S?aten?ut of the C?. AS the court ?f? ? ?t ?y p?Bmi? ?j?ct?on ?trai? the e?or?ment of the ? ? by the ?i? ?d W?eho?e ?mm?ion, or the p?er m? ?der the act of April 4, 1907, ? the ?e ? ?n ae?p? oy the rai? and we? ? o?m?on, the ?t s? t?t ?n o?tt? the ?nting of ?ch p? injection the n? ?ty w? ob? u?n t?t h? of de?g whe? �e m? ? by the ?m?ion, or the ?er m? ?ther or ?y, we? ? ?d ?d not ?o? r?- ?ble ?m?tion for ?e ? ?nd? ?d a pm?r ?owan? for ?e pm?y employS, ?d for th? ? t?t quezon ? not ?n ?de?, but ?much ? the m? ? by the ? of Ap?l 18, 1?7, ? not gone in? for? �e ?t o?: "It ? ? m?, u?n t? e?den? of �e ?n?o? ?fore either of th? new m? we? put ? eff?t (t?t ?, the order of the ?on of Sep?m?r, 1?, or ?e act of Ap? 4, 1?7), ?d the ?uctio? ?e by thee m?, t?t ? there ? ?d? the ?uc?on wMch ? at?mp? ? ? ?e by the ?mm?ty ?t (Apr? 18, 1?7) it ? ? du? the ?m?tion receiv? by the ?mpa? ?1ow w?t wo?d ? a f? ?m?tion for the ? ?ffo?, in- clu? ? ?eq? ret? u?n the p?rty inv?. ?d I t?, on the whole, t?t a p? injunction shoed ?ue, M ? to the ra? fix? by c?p?r 232 (act of Ap? 18), ?k? of ? the comm?ity m?, ?d t?t there ?o?d ? no preli? Mj?ction ? ? the other m?, ?h ? ? ? ? w? ? are ?a? ? ?t ? a ? wh?h ?y be ?i? in ? fi? ?i? o? ? ?." ?e ?y afar ?he ?anti? of t? pm?mi? injection the At?mey ?ne?, in ?o?tion of such in?nction, ? a ?ti?on for ? al?tive ?t of ?m? ?n one bf the ? of the S?, ?d ob? ? o?er' fm? t?t ?u?, ?p?m?r 24, 1?7, dir?t? the ?tive ?t ? ?ue ? pmy? for in the ?tition. ?e ?t w? the?r ?u? ? ? u?n ?he No?he? P?e ?way ?m?y,
�
