Ez ?ar? YOUNG. ?0? U. 8. Ol?/nion of t? Oom? This d?hion w? ? ? P? v. 8?, 1? U. 8.'?7, At?ntion ? a? ?e? W ?e ? d M? &c. R?. Co. v. M? R. R. &c. C?'?,, 1? U.S. ?. T?t w? a ?it brought ? a s? ? of M? by the ?mm?ione? of the S?, who ? the ?we? ? them by the s?tu? ?t fo?h ? ?e ?rt. ?e? s?t w? a?mt �e r?lway ?mp?y ? ?m?l it ? ?nt?ue ?n c? it w? ?ng for c?-g ?e ?n?e bdd? over the M?d ?iver. The defe?t ?t ? ?move the ? the F?e? ?, wM? the p?s ?, ?d ?e s? ? ?f? ? ?move on the ?o?d t?t the ?d p?- ? w? the S? of M?, ?d it w? pm?r ? ? ?d the f? of the ? W .de?e t?t f?t. ? m?ner the ? ?e he?, ?d ? ? hdd t?t ?e S?te w? not ?e ?1 p?y p?ff, and ?e ? ? t?fo? ?n pm?rly ?mov? ?m ?e s? ?t, wh? ju?ent w? the?u?n ?ve?d. Appl?g the ?me pHncipl? of ?mt?cfion ? ?e ?moval ?t w?ch ? ?n applied W the ?eventh ?endment, it w? ?d by t? ?urt t?t ?e S?te ?ght ? '?e ? ?ty p?fiff when the ?Hef ?ught euur? ? it alone, ?d ? wh?- favor the ju?ent or dec?, if for the p?n?, ?11 eff? ive? o?m?. ?t. hough the ?e ? one ? ?der the removal ?t ?d d? not ?volve the Eleventh ?endment, it neve?hele? ill?tm? the quition ?w ?fore ?, and rei?m? the d? t?e t?t the S? ? not a p?y W a s?t ?imply ?a? the S? ? ?ion ? such ?y. The d?t?e oI ?mF? v. A?s ? a? ?fe? W and i?m? ? ?, A? O?, v. A? &c. Ra?r? Co., ? U.S. 273, ?. ?e ako McN?l v. ? ?- ?, ? U.S. ?59; MO?p? ? C?m? v. l?i? &c. ? Co., 2? U.S. ?5, 3?. ?e vaHo? authoHti? we ?ve ?fe? W fumhh ample' jmtifi?tion for the ?ertion t?t in?duah, who, ?
�
