196 OCTOBER TERM? 1907. H?U.?N, J? dissemtin? ?09 13'. jurisdiction and i? w?t of autho?ty ? en? a ?n? very ? ? w?ch ju?ction ? not ?." ?u?l for the r?lway ?mp?y p? some re? on P? v. M?hy, 1? U.S. 1, 18, ? w?ch ?e ?- o? c? on the general subj?t of s? ?t the S? were c?ifi?. T?t ?e w? a ?t in eq? ?a?t ? pa?ies "who, under the ?titution of Omen, ? ?vemor, ? of S?, and ?r of t?t S?, ?mp? the ? of ?d ?m?ionem of t?t S?, ? ?t? ?d enjo? them from ?ng ?d ?nve? a ?ge amo?t of ?d in t?t S?, ? w?ch the pla?t? ? title." T?t ?t, in ?ew of the nat? of the re?ef ?k?, ?d of the ? tio? of the defend? ? the mature ?volv?, w? held not ? ? one ?t the S? ?t?n the m?g of the Eleventh Amendment. But afar a renew of the f? the co?t, ? o? ? ?l? r? ? it, t?k ?cial ? ? o?e: "In t? ?nnection it m?t ? ?me in mind t?t t?s s?t ? not no?nally ?t the Governor, ?m? of S?, and ?er, ? s? o?s, but ?ai?t them ?l- lectively, ? the ?d of ?nd ?ionem." The p?nt ?it ?, in ?, ?t Young "? At?mey GenerM of M?," and the decr? w? ?ught ?ai?t ?m, ? tach o?r, not ?t him indi?dua?y, or ? a me? ?- ?tive o?cer c?ged ?th cer?in duti?. One of the c? cit? in sup? ?f the d?ion now demd ? M?s?, Ka? & T? Rad?y Co. v. M?s? R. R. & Ware? Co?s, 1? U.S. ?, ?, '59. But although t?t p?ic? s?t w? held not ? ? one agai?t the Sta?, the ?e, in r?t of the pHncipl? a?oun? by the court, ? in ?ony ?th the ?e? I ?ve exp?. For, the court there ?: "W? the S? the ?l party plain- tiff? It w? at an e?ly day held by th? ?, coatming the Eleventh Amendment, t?t in a? ? whe? juH?ic- tion de?nds on the p?ty, it is the p?y ?m? in the Osb? v. Un? S?s Ba?, 9 ?cat. 738. But t?t ?c?i?l ?tmction ? ?eld? ? one mo? in ? ?th the
�
