?0? IL ?. Op?uion of t12 ?ourt? a m '?t of ?tle ? ?e pretty. ?o? the ?d!n? 0f ?t u?n wMch the d? w? ? w? one .althou? a Bq?dafion ?d ?ttlem?t of ?e ? of the fa?er, mother ?d ?n ? ?n pmy?, ? ?tt?ment not ?nt?l, ? full ?ef ?d ? ?o? ?out ?tMg. ?fo? ?ming ? ?ider su? of ?e ?en? of ?r ? ?o ?t? o? ?, we ? ?o? t?t we m?t ?t de?ne whether ?e ne? p?i? ? ?fo? j?fy ? in d?i? the ? on ?e m?. ?d th? Mq? ? Mvolves de?n? whether the n? ?i.? w? ?fo? the ? ?1ow ? autho? it ? ?ke the d? wMch it en?. ? duty in the ?t?r .w? ? s? ? Min? v. "The ?bMh? pmcti? of ? of eq?ty ? ? the p?nfiff's biH? if it ap? t?t ? ?t the ?ef pmy? for would inj?o?ly ?ect ? ?y in?s? ? the ?bjeS?t?r who ? not ?e ?i? ? the ?t, ? fo?d? u?n cle? ?, and may ? eMor? by the ?t, ?, though not r? by ?e pl? or s? by the co?l. Sh? v. Ba?, 17 How. 130; H? v. 19 How. 271, 278; Pa? v. W4nni? ? Co? Woo? Co., 2 B?ck, ?." X?: "The ?neml ?le in ?ty ? ?t ? ? ?y in?d, either le?y or ?neficially, in ?e subjugator of a ?it, ? ? ? ?e pa?i? ? it, ? t?t the? ?y ? a comple? dec?, wMch s?l b?d them a?. By tMs the co? 2 e?bled ? ?ke a ?mple? d? ?tw?n the p?ti?, ? p?vent fut? ?ti?fion, by ?Mng away the n? c?ity of a multip?city of s?, ?d ? ?ke it ?tly ? t?t no inj?fi? ? done, either ? the ?i? ?fo? it, or ? othe? who are in? ? the subjec?t?r, by de? wMch mi?t othe? ? ? u?n a ? view o?y of the ?al me?. ?en ? the ? am ?fo? ?e
�
