p? of one ?r mo? of the c? ?t ?t en?em? ? the scheme ?ex? ? the ?n?t of ? ?n. "No. 3. ?e j? ? ?c? ?t ? ?ey ?d for p?, the? react m?t not ? for ? amo?t ? ? of a m?ble pink,ion of the v?o? s? ?t?y ?d by it W i? ?cyholde? ?der ?' o?1 ?n?c? or ?umem? ? ?e ?h?ule at? ? ?e .d?on he?." ?e ?t?efio? w? ?f? ?d the ?f? d?y ex- ?p? W. Themunn the j?, ?d? ?c?o?, ?t? a v?ct ? favor of ?e p?n? .for $12,613.?, ?i? ?o?t w?ch it w? ?n? w? due ?der ?e ?m?t, pm?d? the fact of ?lvency ?d non-?t by the ? &d not ?fitu? a def?. M?. A?r? Y. B? ?d Mr. H. P?wR w?m M?. C? H. B? w? on .?e b?ef, for p? ? e?r: Under the ?n?ct of ? ? u?n ?e m?t ?ve ?d the 1? on ? ? by it ?f? ?ver from ?e ? ?m?y. ?e pm?o? fo?d ? ? 10 ?d 11 of the wn?t ?lu?ly ?ntm?g ? t?s ?. ?e? ? not? ?ble ? the pm?o? nor do ?ey wn?vene ?y ?le of pubic ?cy. The ?n?t of ? ? ?e not for the ?efit of ?e ?cyho? ?d? �e ? ?m?y, but for the pw?on of ?e ?, ?d ?e ? of it cle?ly d?om? ?t it w? in- ?d?, not ? p?tion ?t me? ?bi?ty W ?y, ?t ?t ?t? ?t of 1?. "?n?c? of ?, ?e other ?nt? ? W ? wn- st? ?ng W the se? ?d m?g of t? ? w?ch �e ?i? ?ve ?, ?d ? they ? clear ?d ?m?mb?o?, their ? ? ? ? ?ken an? unde? ? ?e? p?, or- dlna? ?d ?p? s?." Im? Fi? I?. Co. v. C?
�
