?0? U.& Oplnion of tl? Co?t. tin's Admr. v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 151 U. S? 673; M?n N?. R. R. Co. v. Da?, 157 U.S. ?1; dh? ?d ?h?. A ? friend, a citi? of M?ufi, ap?int? ?der ?e ? of M? ? pr?cu? a suit for. ? infant of I11?o? ?t a defcnd?t of Kentucky, s?t ? the C?cuit ?u? of the Uni?d S? by the non- ?ident d?d?t on t? ?d of dive?c ?tize?p, ? elect ? ?b?t ? the j?ction of the ?uit ?u? of the U?- ? ? or ? ?ve the ?u? rc?d? on the ?d t?t the ?t ? not a ?sident of the ?. ? the plYtiff ch? ? ?d &d submit ? the junction of the ?, ?d ? the j?ction of the ?u? the?by ?h?, ?e next f?end ?ot thereaftcr'?idcr ? ch?ce ?d ?ve the ? &v? of i? ?iction by ? motion ? ?d the ? ? ?e sta? c?u?. ?evi?i S?tu? of M?, 18? ?1, ?2, ?, ? ?d ?7; ?l? v. Bowls, 77 M?, ?3; M?n on Removal of Ca?, ? 70, p. 118; ?i? v. M?l?n S? RF., 157 Mi?ufi, 477, 514; Ki? v. B?, 1? U.S. M?. Jvs? BR?, ?r ? ?e fo?go?g s?ment, de?ve? ?e option of ?e ?. It w? held ? Ex ?e W?, ? U.S. ?9, t?t: "Under ?c?ons 1, 2, 3 of the act of M?ch 3, 1875, 18 S?t. 470, ? amended by the act of M?ch 1, 1?7, 24 S?t. ?2, ? by the act of Au? 13, 1?, tion ?en? ? a ?a? couP, by a citi?n of ?other S?, ? a non-?dent defendant, who is a titiron of a S? other t? that of the plaintiff, ?nnot ? ?mov? by ?e defen?t in? the ?rcuit ?u? of the Uni?i S?s." ? the authority of this c?e it is ?ntended by ?titi?ner t?t ? in th? ?tion none of the pa?i? were citizens of the S?te of M?oufi, it could not I? removed by the defendant
�
