INDEX. in resard to p?yment of interest on taxes does not constitute a dis- crimination amounting to a denial of equal protection of tha law? with? the m? of the Fourteenth Amendment. T? v. 3. Jv?a?c?o?, B 3, 4. ; The export and pmferance claum of tha?on?titution proMbite burdeas only by way of actual taxation and duty, or leghdatlon intending to give, and actually giving, the pmhihited pcefereace, and dce? not prohibit the merely incideatal effect of insulations of interstate commerce wholly InternOte Comme?e Act may affect the porta of one State having natural advantages more than those of another State not ?g such advant?ce does not reader the act unconstitutional a? ?iolating that provleJon. Aow?r Pac? Co. v. Un?tzd ?at?, 56. Po? o?.a? ? p? ,?b. ? Jwam?xc?oN r? 4. 14. Pri? a,? ?,,.,?; ?11? o! ? ? Ioeo?. ? ,?,,..? o! CRize? of other 8tatce am not denied equal privilesce wit, hin the meaning of the immunity elaum of the Con?tution by a etalute forbidding the divee?on of warera of the State if they am a? f?e a? the elti?e? of tl?, such a question he mi?i by & c?tisan of the State iteelI. H?oaWatar Co. v. McCert?, ?49. 8ce E?pra, 8. CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES. S?'o?s, A. CONTEMFr OF COURT. An order of the Circuit Court committing ope for contempt for violation of a decree ?tered in a suit of which'it did not have jurisdiction is unlaw- fid; and, in such case, upon proper application, this.court will'discharge the pe?on co hekL Es pa? Young, 123. ? Cirouit Court of the United 8tates having, in ?n actlea brought by ? ctochl?older of the Northam Pac[tlc l?.ilw?y Company ?i.-t the officem of the road, certain ehip[?ers and the Attorney C, enera? certeJn other official? of the State of MinneSota, held that a railroad rate statute
�
