$78 INDEX. the sufficiency of the findings to sustain the decree I?med thereon. G'ar- zo? v. d? Rub/o, 283. In this ?ae the facts sustained the pl?ntiff's eoutention that cit? of Sp? ?d ? ? ?t ?t ?em w? no ?d for for w?t of j?icti?. lb. 8. C? ? Cir? C? o I A ?; ?l?im ?. The authority ?ven ? ? 6 of the Judic? Act of ?h 3, 1?1, ? 8?t. 8?, ? t? Ci?uit ?u? of Ap?, ? ?ify pm?tio? of ?w ? ?, ?ot ? ? for the pu? of ?d?g w?le ? for i? ?idemt?n ?d d?is?u. A ? w? d? ?t ?t fo?h the pm?tio? of ?w, cl?y ?, w?ch ?y ? ?t?ut ?fe? ? aU the f?, but which ? fo?h ?x? q? of ?w ?d f?t ?g th? ? ? ? s? of ?n- ?, ?d, ? the ?ht of ?1 the ?t?ouy, ? ?e w?t ?d ? the jurat of the lower ?, h def?ive (C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. W?, ? U. 8. ?, 4?.) H? v. Un? ?, 101. B. O? Cm? ?. ? me? p? ou t? ? of s 8? ? s f?t t? j?tion of the F?ml ? w? it sp? t?t ?'no ? h? h the rantmyer; ?d i? ? ? ?in whe?r the S? ? ? ?1 ?y by ?i? ?t?h t? ?stion of whet?r a ?lwsy ?tu? h w &ow ? ? ? ?n? ?vol? ?lut?n ? ? Fede? q?tion, ?d the suffi? of ? qum?n over w?ch th e p?r ?ui? ? h? j?iht?n, ? ?der t? ?titut?n of ? U? ?. ? ? Y?, 1?. Hu? v. W?, ?. a? ?i? ?1? ?1. A ? ?lm? m? s?tu? which ? such ex?ve ?1? t?t ?i? ?e? sm de? from ?g i? ?li?ty ? t? ?u? d? �e ?er the eq? pm?t?n of the ?w ?thout ?on of ?ffiei? of the m? p?; it ? ?t? the j?i?n, ?d 2 t? duty, of t? C?uit ?u? ? ?q? whether such ? low ? ? ? ?n?, ?d if ? ? ?tly enjoin the ?lm? ?mp?y, at the ?it of one of ? ?ckholde?, f?m putt?g t? fo?, ?d it ? ?wor ?g such ?q? 'u?ctiou ? the ?e ?
�
