enjoin an individual or a state officer from enforcing a state statute on account of its unconstitutionality, but it may not re?train the state court from acting in' any case brought b?foro it either of a civil or criminal ?tum, or prevent any inveetigatio? or action by a grand jury. Ez ? You?, 12?. 9. Waive,- o! obi?ction ?o. While consent cannot confer on a Federal court jurisdiction of a c?e of which no Federal court would have jurisdiction, either party rmsy w?ive t?e objections that the case wa? not brought in, or removed to, the imrtioular Federal 0curt provided by the statute. In r? Moo'e, 490. 10. 8am?. Nothtn? in Ex ? Wi?a?, 203 U. 8. 449, ehenges the rulz that a party may waive the objection to the jurisdiction iu reject to a partiouls. r oom$ where diversity of citlaenship s?tually exizte. lb. $? S?v?s, 8. No ?lequate ren?dy at law, sufficient to prevent a court of equity from act- ing, exlt? in a c?e where the enforcement of an unconstitutional state rate statute would req?re the complainant to carry merchandise at con- tischtory rates if it complied with the statute and subject it to excessive penalties in case it did not comply therewith and its validity was finally sustained. Ez parte Young, 1?. 8? Covers, 4; JURIliD?CTIO?, D 8; Co?raxo.rtONA? LAW? 8, 6. , � LAND GRANTS. 8? 1%-s,.,c Lam?, 1. LEASE.
�
