914 SIXTY—SIXTH CONGRESS. Sess. II. Ch. 235. 1920. tion, or maintenance of irrigation works, and which may be compromised by agreement between the claimant and the Secretary of the Interior; and payment for official tele hone service in the field hereafter incurred in case of official telephones installed in private housesf wheiinauthorized under regulations established by the Secretary o the terior: §j§°,§§§Qf{§i,F;*“· Salt River jxggject, Arizona: For examination of project and project accounts, $1, ; Yum, Armcalif. Yuma project, Arizona-California: For operation and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $435,000; °**¤¤d·C°m· Orland project, California: For o eration and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $120,000; G¤*¤dV¤**¢Y~°¤*°· Grand Valley project, Colorado: For operation and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $208,000; U“°°“‘p“hg’°·C°‘°· Uncompahgre project, Colorado: For operation and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $174,000; B°i"‘?·“"*‘°· Boise project, Idaho: For operation and maintenance, continuamé Ramp tion of construction, and incidental operations, $774,000; Provided, mus- That no part of this appropriation shall be expended for drain e except_in irrigation districts formed under State laws and upon the execution of agreements for the repayment to the Ilmted States of uoréegqeggd imgauou the costs thereof: Prmrtded further, That the foregomgj proviso shall ` not be construed as an expression of opinion by the ongross upon the litigation pending between the Government and the settlers on such projpxclg or any manner prejudice such litigation; Ki¤gHi11,Idah0. King project, Idaho: For operation and maintenance, con- P _ griuatiolp (log constructioéil, andhgicglentald operatiolpg, $320,000: ?°*i*’°-. ravi e , at no expen `ture s e ma e rom t appropria- Lummmm` tion that will bring the total expenditure for the King Hill project to an amount in excess of the amount stipulated in contract dated December 17, 1917, between the King Hill irrigation district and the Secretary of the Interior providing for the construction of the King Hill project by the United States Reclamation Service, unless and until a supplemental agreement has been executed by the Kin Hill irrigation district guaranteeing the reimbursement to the IInited Statesof the total amounts expended on the project; mmaoiaaiaaim. Minidoka project, Idaho: For operation and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $317,000, to- ·*’*“»P·2‘”· gefficr with the unexpended balance of the appropriation for this prtiject for the_fiscal {year 1920; Hunt1cy,Mont. t untley project, lt ontana: Fpr plperation and maintenance, cont1I1l1@tlOH'O construction, and inci ental operations, $129,000; >¤*kRi*’°¤M<>¤¤· Milk River {project, Montana: For operation and maintenance, _, A continuation o construction, and incidental operations, $552,000; S**** R*‘°"*·°**~· Sun River project, Montana: For operation and maintenance, _ continuation 0 construction, and incidental operations, $148,000; M{;g‘[€g_§,§fLf"‘5’¤”°· Lower Yellowstone project, Montana-North Dakota: For operation and maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $83,000; “;"if;f*** Pl¤“€yN*‘>"’—· North Platte project, Nebrasks·Wyoming: For operation and ‘ maintenance, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $1,000,000; ”°"““"5·”°"‘ _ Newlands project, Nevada: For operation and maintenance, con- _ tmuation of construction, and incidental operations, $664,000; €*¤5**>**·*··M€><- Carlsbad project, New_Mexico:_For operation and maintenance, _ continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $108,000; Tg? ¤¤>¤‘*¢·>··¤·¤-- Rio Grandeproject, New Mexico—'l`exas: For operation and main- Am P 201 tenance, continuation_of construction, and incidental operations, ‘ * ‘ · $$1,000,000, together with the unexpended balance of the appropriation for this project for the fiscal year 1920;
