SIXT1-EIGHTH oonennss. sm,. II. cH. 467. 1925. 1187 at a price of not to exceed $500,000, in accordance with the report submitted in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document Numbered 5, Sixty-seventh Con§ress, second session. Beaufort Harbor, orth Carolina, in accordance with the report B°°“'°”·N·¤· submitted in Rivers and Harbors Committee Document Numbered 8 Sixty-eighth Congress, second session. , Waterway between Charleston, South Carolina, and Saint Johns W¤*¤¤’W¤Y· C*=¤¤¤¤· River, Florida: In accordance with the report submitted in Senate i°¤i1¤h¤ShgE:,°ili1‘i.S°mt Document Numbered 178, Sixty-eighth Con ess, second session, and sugjrect to thefconduiions set forth in said gdcuments. aterway rom harleston to Win ah Ba South arolin W¤*m'e>’· CMM accordance with the report submitted irsi Houseyl)oc11men€NumliLer;d téinclc www Bm 237, Sixty-eighth Congress, first session, and subject to the conditions set forth in said document. Shipyard Creek, South Carolina, in accordance with the re ort Sh*PY¤¤*C*°°*·$·0- submitted in House Document Numbered 288, Sixty-eighth gongress, first session, and subject to the conditions set forth in said document. Fernandina Harbor, Florida, in accordance with the re ort sub- F°*’¤¤¤°i¤¤·F'*· mitted in House Document Numbered 227, Sixty-eighth Congress, first session. Miami Harbor, Florida, in accordance with the report submitted M*“¤*·I"l°· in House Document Numbered 516, Sixty-seventh Congress, fourth session, and subject to the conditions set forth in said document. Charlotte Harbor, Florida in accordance with the report sub- °h¤¤¤¤*¤·-Fl¤- mitted in House Document Numbered 113, Sixty-sixth Congress, first session. Bayou La Batre, Alabama, in accordance with the re rt of the M*:¤Y°¤ L¤ Bm Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors submittedm in Rivers ` and Harbors Committee Document Numbered 4, Sixty-eighth Congress, first session, and subject to the conditions set forth in said report, except as to the conditions requiring local interests to contribute toward the first cost of said project. The Louisiana and Texas Intracoastal Waterway, from the Mis- Iuyghmmja ·¤$v':‘g•: sissippi River at or near New Orleans, Louisiana, to Galveston way. Bay, Texas, in accordance with the rpport submitted in House Document Numbered 238, Sixty-eighth ongress, first session, and subject to the conditions set fort in said document: Provided, E',,,’°' ,,°°d{,¤,,;jm;¤,¤_ That the amount hereby authorized to be expended upon saidlpiroject shall not exceed the sum of $9,000,000: Provided further, _ at no N° °*P°¤*°'°**°¤d'· expense shall be incurred by the United States for aoqu1r1n,_q_any lands required for the purpose of this improvement: Prmuded Number 0, dma further, That not more than two Government dredges shall be con- limited. structed for use in prosecuting this project. _ _ _ _ Sabine-Neches waterway, Texas.——The modification of the project wf;;f’$;§°°°°*w•°°" recommended in House Document Numbered 234, Sixty-eighth rmaecemoamea. Congress, first session, is hereby authorized. _ Houston Ship Channel, Texas, in accordance with the reggrt sub- m?‘2,."éf"’ SNP C"‘°‘ mitted in House Document Numbered 93, Sixty-seventh ngress. first session, and subject to the conditions forth in said document. Freeport Harbor, Texas, in accordance with the report submitted F*’°°P°"·· T°’· in Rivers and Harbors Committee, Document Numbered 10, Sixty- eighth Congress, second session, and subject to the conditions set forth in said document. _ G Ri m Galena River, Illinois: Funds for the removal of the dams in the Rgyaj ‘§{· mm Galena River which were rendered useless by theabandonment of etgbitjzcgilmz the Galena River Lock, under authority of the River and Harbor Act of September 22, 1922, may be a lotted from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made by_ Congress for the improvement, preservation, and maintenance of rivers and harbors.
