Barbot v. United States
(273 F.)
The President, by his order of August 28, 1919, exercised his discretion in respect of subject-matter over which, by the act of May 20, 1918, he had full power and authority, and the discretion, so exercised, is not reviewable.
The order dismissing the writ is affirmed.
Barbot v. United States.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. May 5, 1921.)
No. 1838.
Poisons 
4—Defrauding revenue not essential to conviction for violation of Narcotic Act.
In the prosecution of a physician for prescribing or dispensing drugs in violation of Harrison Narcotic Act § 2 (Comp. St. § 6287h), it is not a defense that his acts were not intended, and did not tend, to violate or defeat the revenue provisions of the act but the only issue is whether he acted in good faith in prescribing drugs to patients for maladies requiring administration of the drug, or whether he dispensed or prescribed them generally to persons seeking his professional aid merely to procure the drugs.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Columbia; Henry A. Middleton Smith, Judge.
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Louis D. Barbot. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
John P. Grace, of Charleston, S. C., for plaintiff in error.
J. Waties Waring, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Charleston, S. C. (Francis H. Weston, U. S. Atty., of Columbia, S. C., on the brief), for the United States.
Before Knapp and Woods, Circuit Judges, and Waddill, District Judge.
Waddill, District Judge. Louis D. Barbot, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, is and was a physician, and prior to the commission of the offense of which he stands indicted had long practiced his profession in the city of Charleston. He was for some years professor of anatomy at the South Carolina Medical College, of high standing in the community, a member of the leading medical societies, accomplished in his profession, and enjoyed a large practice. On the 2d of December, 1919, he was indicted by the grand jury of the United States District Court at Columbia, charged with the violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Drug Act of the 17th of December, 1914 (38 Stat. 786; Comp. St. §§ 6287g–6287q). The indictment contained 16 counts. The first 2 related to failure to keep proper records as a licensed physician under that act, and the remaining 14 covered sales of morphine and cocaine to divers persons named in the several counts, not in the course of his professional practice. Upon his trial, the jury
For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
