Jump to content

Page:United States v. Trump - Government's Motion for Immunity Determinations.pdf/153

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC
Document 252
Filed 10/02/24
Page 153 of 165

of one of its managing directors,  P75  in his cell phone; some of those calls occurred at the White House.[1]  P9  directly passed the information to the defendant.[2]

 P9  had other contact regarding initiatives by the Campaign or its outside attorneys. For example,  P9  was on a call with the defendant and  CC2  on December 9 regarding the defendant's motion, in his capacity as a candidate, to intervene in Texas v. Pennsylvania.[3] Separately,  P9  spoke to the defendant about the lawsuit, and explained how the legal system worked and that the Campaign—not the Justice Department or FBI—was responsible for filing election challenge lawsuits.[4]

Throughout these conversations, even if  P9  could be understood to have been acting in official capacity—which he was not—rather than a Campaign one, the defendant was himself acting in his private capacity as a candidate. The defendant was asking for  P9  view on various strategic decisions he was making regarding his Campaign and his private attorneys, and he was getting reports from  P9  on information related to actual and potential election challenges important to his candidacy and private Campaign. All of this context establishes both that  P9  wore two hats—one official, one private—and that the defendant interacted with  P9  in these conversations as a candidate rather than as President. The interactions between the defendant and  P9  that the Government intends to introduce at trial were thus all private.


  1. GA 719, 721 ( ).
  2. GA 717-718 ( ).
  3. GA 713 ( ).
  4. GA 687 ( ).

- 153 -