teau. The advantages of the region had been demonstrated by the failure to overcome Osorno. His presence sufficed to render the highway to Vera Cruz insecure and to necessitate strong escorts for the rare convoys, causing an immense increase in the prices of merchandise.[1]
The train leaving Mexico in January 1814 consisted of eighty-seven coaches, with passengers, and 7,000 pack-mules, carrying five millions in precious metals, besides other effects. Among those departing were the oidores Bodega and Villaurrutia, Salcedo, later comandante general of the provincias internas, and several distinguished persons suspected of revolutionary tendencies, such as Doctor Alcalá, and promoter Cortazar.[2] Later in the year went Conde de Castro Terreño and Olazábal, both with lessened glory. The convoy was harassed, especially after leaving Puebla, and at San Juan where a valuable part of it was cut off.[3] The transit occupied more than a month, and the return cargo did not reach Mexico till the middle of April, owing to stoppages at different points.
The delays and excessive charges were due less to danger from attack than to the reprehensible greed of officials, from the lowest upward, who aside from the money to be gained in the escort service, made large sums by speculating in merchandise or accepting bribes and partnerships from traders interested in certain goods and districts, and so retarding or advancing convoys at their will, under plausible pretences. Iturbide was known to have engaged in such transactions with the silver consignments from Guanajuato,
- ↑ Coaches were taxed $600 each, and other things in proportion.
- ↑ Both sent by force as deputies for Guanajuato. Alaman, who joined the party, adds many details. Hist. Méj., iv. 36-9. Finding the road toward Puebla unmolested, several went on in advance of the slow convoy, only to be cut down by lurking bands.
- ↑ Martinez effected the capture. Oidor Bodega alone lost 1,000 ounces in gold, and the jewels of his wife, worth $40,000, which fell into the hands of Intendente Aguilar. For details, see Rivera, Hist. Jal., i. 472-3; Hernandez y Dávalos, Col. Doc., v. 292 etc.; Orizava, Ocurrencias, 42-3, 85-6. Also Rosains' account in Revol. Verd. Origen, 63-4; Arrangoiz, Méj., i. 240-1, 261; Gaz. de Mex., 1814, v. 361-3.
