sage[1] he suggested that the sister republic should be allowed "one more opportunity to atone for the past, before we take redress into our hands. But to avoid any misconception on the part of Mexico, as well as to protect the American national character from reproach, this opportunity should be given with the avowed design and full preparation to take immediate satisfaction." The president accordingly asked for the passage of an act authorizing reprisals and the use of the navy against Mexico, to enforce them in the event of that government refusing to come to terms."[2] Though congress was not ready actually to declare war, the proposal to make another demand on Mexico was accepted, both houses making exaggerated and hostile reports.[3]
I have already alluded to the treaty stipulation forbidding acts of reprisal and declarations of war on complaints for grievances or damages, till they should have been presented and verified, a clause wholly ignored by the president of the United States in his message, which was accompanied by forty-six new grievances. Of the original eighteen, only one, dated as far back as 1831, and in the new set no less than thirty-two, were founded on acts said to have been committed prior to 1832, and which, had they ever been valid, were already consigned to the grave by the treaty of April 5, 1831.[4]
- ↑ Of Feb. 6, 1837. Cong. Debates, 1836–7, xiii. 723-4; U. S. Govt, Cong. 24, Ses. 2, H. Journ., 354-5, Sen. Doc., 160, pp. 1-170.
- ↑ Upon another demand thereof, made on board one of our vessels of war on the coast of Mexico.' U. S. Govt, Cong. 24, Ses. 2, H. Ex. Doc. 105 and 139; Niles' Reg., li. 378.
- ↑ The committee of foreign affairs in the house declared that the U. S. would be justified in taking redress; that of the senate was equally hostile. U. S. Govt, Cong. 24, Ses. 2, H. Ex. Doc. 281, pp. 1-4, H. Comm. Rept, 281, vol. ii., Sen. Doc. 189, vol. ii.; Cong. Debates, 1836-7, i. 723-4, 854-7, 982, 986, ii. 1912-18; Cong. Globe, 1836-7, 6, 12, 94; 1837, 1-8.
- ↑ Mexican Company, Baltimore, 1816; amount not given. This association furnished Gen. Mina with means to invade New Spain, which they asserted had never been paid. Mrs Young, 1817; sum not stated. She was the widow of Col Guilford Young, one of Mina's companions killed in action in Mexico that year. The claim was probably for arrears of pay. These two demands were for revolutionary services against Spain, with whom the U. S. and their citizens were at the time at peace, several years before her domination over Mexico had ceased. John B. Marie, 1824; amount not
