The Rengmahs on the Assam hills attach to the body a tail of wood eighteen inches long, curved upwards, which they use to wag defiance at an enemy.[1] Such people evidently could never have had much experience of war. The Mrú on the Chittagong hills are peaceable, timid, and simple; in a quarrel they do not fight, but call in an exorcist to take the sense of the spirits on the matter.[2]
Livingstone says that the tribes in the interior of South Africa, where no slave trade existed, seldom had any war except about cattle, and some tribes refused to keep cattle in order not to offer temptation. In one case only had he heard of war for any other reason; three brothers, Barolongs, fought over one woman, and their tribe had remained divided, up to the time of writing, into three parties. During his residence in the Bechuana country he never saw unarmed men strike each other. They quarrel with words, but generally both parties burst into a laugh and that ends it.[3] By an exception among the Canary islanders, the people of Hierro knew no war and had no weapons, although their long leaping-poles could be used as such when occasion demanded.[4]
A Spanish priest, writing an account, in 1739, of the Aurohuacos of Colombia,[5] says that they have no weapons of offense or defense. If two quarrel they go out to a big rock or tree and each with his staff beats the rock or tree with vituperations. The one whose staff breaks first is the victor; then they embrace and return home as friends. Even our American Indians, who appear in
- ↑ Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland ("J.A.I."), XI, 197.
- ↑ Lewin, T. H.: Wild Races of South-Eastern India, 232.
- ↑ Livingstone, D.: Missionary Travels and Researches in South Africa, I, 232; II, 503.
- ↑ American Anthropologist, N. S., II, 475.
- ↑ Ibid., N. S., III, 612.
