they find numerous similarities so striking as to constitute, in the opinion of Dr Bevan, an effective way of testing the question of authorship[1]. An examination of these parallel passages reveals their very unequal significance for the present discussion. For example, the remark in both the London "Observations" and the "Treatise of Taxes" concerning the causes of the westward growth of London cannot be used to establish their common authorship, John Evelyn having set the idea afloat in the preceding year[2]. In like manner the talk about equalizing the parishes was a current commonplace of the Restoration[3]. On the other hand the remaining parallels, especially that between Graunt's Conclusion (pp. 395—397, post) and various passages in Petty's writings, are doubtless important.
In addition to these parallel passages, other bits of internal evidence have been adduced by the supporters of Petty. "The most notable thing in the first few pages of the 'Bills,'" says Dr Bevan, "is the amount of space devoted to a description of different diseases. They are described with a familiarity and precision which only a physician could be expected to have[4]." Upon a layman the discussions in chapters two and three of the similarities between rickets and liver-growth, and between the green sickness, stopping of the stomach, mother, and rising of the lights, undoubtedly make a learned impression. Whether they were in fact the discussions of a learned or of an ignorant man, a specialist
- ↑ Bevan, Petty, 44. The similar passages discovered in previous discussions of this subject, together with a few others upon which I had chanced, were printed in parallel columns in my article in the Political Science Quarterly, xi. 118—122. The passages in question may be found in this edition by comparing the following pages and lines:
in the London "Observations" in Petty 's Writings. p. 321, l. 6, 7, p. 380, l. 30—33, p. 381, l. 8, 13—15. p. 41, l. 22—31. p. 353. l. 1—23. p. 29, l. 24—29, p. 30, l. 9—10, p. 31, l. 8—14, p. 83, l. 12—17, p. 118, l. 1—6. p. 377. l. 14—17, 35—38. p. 25, l. 15—18, p. 68, l. 22—26. p. 382, l. 20—22. p. 23, l. 23, p. 24, l. 36. p. 395. l.30—p. 397, l. 9. p. 49, l. 28—p. 50, l. 9, p. 49, l. 6—10, p. 52, l. 33 p. 53, l. 4, p. 34, l. 26—28, p. 26, l. 33—p. 27, l. 4. p. 270, l. 14—21. - ↑ See his Fumifugium (1661), p. 16, and cf. pp. 41, 380, 381, post.
- ↑ Cf. p. 5, note.
- ↑ Bevan, Petty, 46; cf. pp. post, 346—363.
