Jump to content

Rabeck v. New York/Dissent Douglas

From Wikisource
933027Rabeck v. New York — DissentWilliam O. Douglas
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

391 U.S. 462

Rabeck  v.  New York


Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ginsberg v. State of New York, 390 U.S. 629, 650, 88 S.Ct. 1274, 1286.

Mr. Justice HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U.S. 676, 704, 88 S.Ct. 1298, 1313. In addition, he considers it a particularly fruitless judicial act to strike down on the score of vagueness a state statute which has already been repealed.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse