Renner v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of Columbia
Appearance
United States Supreme Court
Renner v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of Columbia
Feb. 24th.
This cause was argued by Mr. Webster and Mr. Jones, [1] for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Key, [2] for the defendants in error. March 5th.
Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notes
[edit]- ↑ They cited Rushton v. Aspinwall, Doug. 679. Chitty on Bills, 62. 465. Bayley on Bills, 185, 186. 7 East's Rep. 231. Lyndo v. Burgos, Per Sir W. Grant, 1 Wheat. Selw. N. P. 280. Heylin v. Adamson, 2 Burr, 678. Thompson v. Ketchum, 8 Johns. Rep. 189. Hoare v. Graham, 3 Cowp. 57. 1 Phillips on Evid. 432, 433. 496. 498. Lewis v. Thatcher, 15 Mass. Rep. 431. Edie v. E. I. Company, 2 Burr, 1216. Davis v. Todd, 4 Taunt. 672.
- ↑ He cited 4 T. R. 173. 2 Caines' Err. 196. 2 Caines' Rep. 443. 1 Caines' Rep. 43. 18 Johns. Rep. 230. 12 Johns. Rep. 423. 13 Johns. Rep. 470. 1 Phillips on Evid. 490. 492. 1 Harris & Johns. 423. 4 Mass. Rep. 251. 6 Mass. Rep. 449. 477. 9 Mass. Rep. 155. 159. 10 Mass. Rep. 26. 366. 12 Mass. Rep. 89. 3 Dall. Rep. 365. 415. 5 Cranch, 49. 9 Cranch, 1.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse