Jump to content

Rindge Company v. Los Angeles County

From Wikisource


Rindge Company v. Los Angeles County Rindge Company
by Edward Terry Sanford
Syllabus

Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 262 U.S. 700 (1923), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a county government could use its power of eminent domain to take land from a private landowner to build a scenic highway.

868719Rindge Company v. Los Angeles County Rindge Company — SyllabusEdward Terry Sanford
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

262 U.S. 700

Rindge Company  v.  Los Angeles County Rindge Company

 Argued: April 26, 1923. --- Decided: June 11, 1923

Messrs. Edward Stafford, of Washington, D. C., and Nathan Newby and J. A. Anderson, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Paul Vallee, of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse