Jump to content

Robinson v. Holman

From Wikisource
Robinson v. Holman
the Arkansas Supreme Court

In Robinson v. Holman, 181 Ark. 428 (1930), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that a political party's exclusion of black citizens did not violate the equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.

2757488Robinson v. Holman1930the Arkansas Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Arkansas

181 Ark. 428

Robinson  v.  Holman

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

Opinion delivered March 24, 1930.

  1. ELECTIONS—POLITICAL PARTY DEFINED.—A "political party" is an unincorporated voluntary association of persons sponsoring certain ideas of government or maintaining certain political principles or beliefs in the public policies of the government, and is in no sense a governmental instrumentality.
  2. ELECTIONS—EXCLUDING NEGROES PROM PARTY PRIMARY.—The Democratic Party of Arkansas, being a voluntary political organization, not an agency of the State, may prescribe rules and regulations defining qualifications of membership and providing that only white persons may become members and vote in the party primaries, without violating the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; Frank B. Dodge, Chancellor; affirmed.

Jno. A. Hibbler, Booker & Booker, and Scipio A. Jones, for appellant.

June P. Wooten and D.K. Hawhorne, for appellee.

[Opinion of the court by Justice EDGAR L. MCHANEY.]

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse