Jump to content

Ryan v. Gifford

From Wikisource
781027Ryan v. Gifford — Syllabusthe Delaware Court of Chancery

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE

918 A.2d 341

WALTER E. RYAN, JR., In the right of and for the benefit of MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff,  v.  JOHN F. GIFFORD, JAMES R. BERGMAN, B. KIPLING HAGOPIAN, A.R. FRANK WAZZAN, ERIC P. KARROS, M.D. SAMPELS, Defendants, and MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., Nominal Defendant.

No. 2213-N  Argued: January 29, 2007 --- Decided: February 6, 2007

Norman M. Monhait, of ROSENTHAL MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: KRISLOV & ASSOCIATES, LTD., Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Peter J. Walsh Jr. and Timothy R. Dudderar, of POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: John M. Potter , of QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Individual Defendants James R. Bergman, B. Kipling Hagopian, A.R. Frank Wazzan, Eric P. Karros, and M.D. Sampels.

Jeffrey L. Moyer and Kelly E. Farnan, of RICHARDS LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Individual Defendant John F. Gifford.

J. Jackson Shrum, of HARVEY PENNINGTON, LTD., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Michael J. Ioannou, of ROPERS MAJESKI KOHN & BENTLEY, San Jose, California, Attorney for Nominal Defendant.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse