Jump to content

Sage v. Central Railroad Company of Iowa/Dissent Miller

From Wikisource
730262Sage v. Central Railroad Company of Iowa/Dissent Freeman Miller — DissentSamuel Freeman Miller
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Miller

United States Supreme Court

93 U.S. 412

Sage  v.  Central Railroad Company of Iowa


MR. JUSTICE MILLER, with whom concurred MR. JUSTICE FIELD, dissenting.

I dissent from this opinion.

I think the Circuit Court, under the circumstances of the case, had a right to treat the application of appellants for appeal as having been made when they asked liberty to use the name of their trustee for that purpose; and it was rightfully allowed by the Circuit Court as of that date. It this be so, it is not denied that the bond approved by me would operate as a supersedeas.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse