Sears v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant/Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

248 U.S. 543

Sears  v.  Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181, 19 Sup. Ct. 644, 43 L. Ed. 936; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243, 20 Sup. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 Sup. Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701.

Notes