Shafer v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden (266 U.S. 593)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shafer v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden
Opinion of the Court
871113Shafer v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

266 U.S. 593

Shafer  v.  Farmers' Grain Company of Embden


Messrs. Seth W. Richardson, of Fargo, N. D., and John Burke, of Bismarck, N. D., for appellants.

Mr. David F. Simpson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

This cause is restored to the docket for reargument on all the questions involved, particularly including the following:

No. 1. Whether the North Dakota statute of 1922 differs materially in its provisions and operations from the statute of 1919 which was held invalid by this court in Lemke v. Farmers' Grain Co., 258 U.S. 50, 42 S.C.t. 244, 66 L. Ed. 458, and Lemke v. Homer Farmers' Elevator Co., 258 U.S. 65, 42 S.C.t. 250, 66 L. Ed. 467.

No. 2. Whether and to what extent section 17 of the statute of 1922 gives effect to and continues in force the provisions of the statute of 1919.

No. 3. Whether and in what particulars the statute of 1922 encroaches upon the field of regulation occupied by the United States grain standards act or conflicts with that act or with its administration.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse