Shockey v. Illinois/Opinion of the Court
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 89, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse