Jump to content

Smith v. Crouse

From Wikisource


Smith v. Crouse
Syllabus
925881Smith v. Crouse — Syllabus
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Harlan

United States Supreme Court

378 U.S. 584

Smith  v.  Crouse

Sidney Smith, pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. of Kansas, and J. richard Foth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas.

PER CURIAM.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse