Jump to content

Smith v. Illinois

From Wikisource
Smith v. Illinois (1968)
Syllabus
932218Smith v. Illinois — Syllabus
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Harlan

United States Supreme Court

390 U.S. 129

Smith  v.  Illinois

Certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

No. 158.  Argued: December 7, 1967 --- Decided: January 29, 1968

Where on cross-examination of principal prosecution witness at petitioner's state trial for illegal sale of narcotics the court sustained the prosecutor's objections to disclosure of witness' correct name and his address, held petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment right, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, to confront the witnesses against him. Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, followed. Pp. 131-133.

70 Ill. App. 2d 289, 217 N.E. 2d 546, reversed.


Gerald W. Getty argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James J. Doherty and Marshall J. Hartman.

John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William G. Clark, Attorney General, and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorney General.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse