Jump to content

Sproles v. Binford

From Wikisource


Sproles v. Binford
by Charles Evans Hughes
Syllabus
882962Sproles v. Binford — SyllabusCharles Evans Hughes
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

286 U.S. 374

Sproles  v.  Binford

 Argued: April 27, 28, 1932. --- Decided: May 23, 1932

[Syllabus from pages 374-376 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Charles I. Francis, of Wichita Falls, Tex., Frank H. Rawlings, of Fort Worth, Tex., LaRue Brown, of Boston, Mass., and J. B. Dudley, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellants.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 376-378 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. John H. Crooker and R. C. Fulbright, both of Houston, Tex., for intervener-appellant.

Mr. Elbert Hooper, of Austin, Tex. (Messrs. James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., T. S.C.hristopher, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. H. Tallichet and W. M. Streetman, both of Houston, Tex., and A. L. Reed, of Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse