Talk:1915

@Billinghurst:

Why did you delete the history of the page?

Secondly, has there been some discussion about linking 'works entitled' to 'year of publication'? CYGNIS INSIGNIS 15:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Cygnis insignis: Initially I thought it was a misdirect as I was there managing misdirects. It was a redirect only, if you want it back, I can do so, not fussed either way. Re discussion, nope, as said there was already a year of one of the publications pointing there—and it is an easy mistake to replicate and we have covered elsewhere with {{bad title}}. Happy to whichever way you see to disambiguate at the page, it is on my review list for tonight as I did feel it was indelicate. May be better as a "see also". — billinghurst sDrewth 22:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I had to think about this for a minute … the options are restore the redirect with or without the history.I lik edit histories, but think that redirects should have no history: what a condrundrum :)

Neither of us seem inclined to challenge the consensus that main space is for titles, so the inadvertent maintenance is not 'meaningful history'. Does putting it back, the way it was, sit okay with you? CYGNIS INSIGNIS 11:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)