Talk:Chemical National Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Company
Add topic
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve the United States Supreme Court case pages. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | Chemical National Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Company, to be due, under a written lease, from August 1, 1893, to April 30, 1894 The cause was submitted to the court for trial on a stipulation as to the facts, of which the lease formed a part The issues were found in favor of defendants, and judgment was rendered accordingly Plaintiff took the case to the appellate court for the First district of Illinois, which affirmed the judgment as to the receiver, but reversed it as to the Chemical National Bank, and entered judgment for the sum of $9,000 58 Ill App 256 An appeal was prosecuted to the supreme court of Illinois, and the judgment of the appellate court affirmed 156 Ill 522, 41 M E 225 This writ of error was thereupon brought . |
| Source: | Chemical National Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Company from http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/161 |
| Contributor(s): | BenchBot |
| Level of progress: | Text being edited 
|
| Notes: | Gathered and wikified using an automated tool. See this documentation for more information. |
Start a discussion about Chemical National Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Company
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikisource the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Chemical National Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Company.
