Talk:Crawford v. Neal/Opinion of the Court
Add topic
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve the United States Supreme Court case pages. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | Crawford v. Neal, by Charles A Neal in the circuit court of the state of Oregon, for the county of Linn, July 1, 1886, against James H Foster, John A Crawford, William Crawford, Ashby Pearce, John R Baltimore, J L Liles, E Walden, and W H Goltra, and subsequently removed, on the application of the complainant, to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon The bill was in the nature of a creditor's bill, seeking to set aside certain conveyances of real (and some personal) property by the defendant James H Foster to the defendants John A Crawford, William Crawford, and Ashby Pearce, upon the ground that they were made to hinder, delay, and defraud the complainant and certain of the defendants, as judgment creditors of the said Foster Complainant was a citizen of the state of Illinois, and defendants were citizens of the state of Oregon, and complainant claimed as the assignee of two judgments, the first rendered in the state circuit court March 8, 1886, in favor of Sibson, Quackenbush & Co, for $14,03787, with costs and interest; and the second rendered in the same court, and on the same day, in favor of W C Noon & Co, for the sum of $1,92035, with interest The defendants Goltra, Walden, Liles, and Baltimore were also judgment creditors of Foster . |
| Source: | Crawford v. Neal from http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/144 |
| Contributor(s): | BenchBot |
| Level of progress: | Text being edited 
|
| Notes: | Gathered and wikified using an automated tool. See this documentation for more information. |
Start a discussion about Crawford v. Neal/Opinion of the Court
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikisource the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Crawford v. Neal/Opinion of the Court.
