Talk:Dunphy v. Ryan/Opinion of the Court
Add topic
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve the United States Supreme Court case pages. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | Dunphy v. Ryan, ies, and there is 'but one form of action for the enforcement or protection of private rights and the redress or prevention of private wrongs,' which is 'the same at law and in equity' Rev St Mont 1879, p 41 This law being in force, James M Ryan, the defendant in error, brought this suit in the district court for the Third judicial district, in the county of Lewis and Clarke, Montana territory, against Elijah M Dunphy, the plaintiff in error, to recover judgment against the latter on his promissory note for $1,51150, dated June 1, 1879, and payable to the plaintiff in error on December 1st following . |
| Source: | Dunphy v. Ryan from http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/116 |
| Contributor(s): | BenchBot |
| Level of progress: | Text being edited 
|
| Notes: | Gathered and wikified using an automated tool. See this documentation for more information. |
Start a discussion about Dunphy v. Ryan/Opinion of the Court
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikisource the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Dunphy v. Ryan/Opinion of the Court.
