Talk:United States v. Weed (389 F.3d 1060)
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve Wikisource's collection of legal source texts, including judicial opinions, statutes, and legal scholarship. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
| Source: | United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, November 16, 2004, No. 03-5100, United States of America v. Jason M. Weed, APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (D.C. NO. CR-02-10-K), November 16, 2004 |
| Contributor(s): | Smee, LegalSkeptic |
| Level of progress: | progress description and icon [[Image:XX%.png]] |
| Notes: | Author:United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
| Proofreaders: | Smee |
additional information
[edit]This article sets forth the basic facts but fails to include information from that training seminar one week earlier. Landmark warns participants of outcomes up to and including suicide from taking 'The Forum' seminar. You can access that warning by visiting the Landmark page, typing Notices in the search window then clicking the search return. Scroll down that page to "Notice of Important Information, Health Warnings, and Legal Agreements" then scroll further down to item number six. Landmark is unaware of the cause of these mental disturbances. But it is a little known problem called Subliminal Distraction exposure.
Weed did not have another mental incident in the years he was held in confinement. Rather than find out why this seminar causes mental breaks psychiatrists threw out that important fact and substituted their fictional psychosocial explanation. "If you live a lie, the truth seems strange" Subliminal Distraction is not mentioned in the DSM. But Qi Gong psychotic reaction is. That too is caused by SD exposure.
If Landmark turned off the lights in the assembly rooms where the seminar is held all the negative mental events would stop. But so would the claimed fantastic results they get.
L K Tucker 24.96.50.118 19:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is not an "article" it is a primary source document of a United States federal court case. -- Cirt (talk) 20:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)