Talk:Walter v. Bickham/Opinion of the Court
Add topic
|
This page is part of a WikiProject to improve the United States Supreme Court case pages. To participate see the project page. |
| Information about this edition | |
|---|---|
| Edition: | Walter v. Bickham, itors of Lake & Austin, sued out from the court below an attachment against the property of said debtors, directed to the marshal of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi The writ came to the hands of that officer for execution The attorney of the plaintiffs informed him that 'he wanted a blank deputization on a writ of attachment to send to Grenada,' which was the place of the residence of the debtors This request was at first denied, but finally the following indorsement was made on the writ: 'I hereby appoint _____ _____ my special deputy to execute this writ, the plaintiff not holding me for the acts of such deputy J L MORPHIS, US Marshal' The writ, so indorsed, was delivered to the attorney of the attaching creditors, and he proceeded to Grenada with it . |
| Source: | Walter v. Bickham from http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/122 |
| Contributor(s): | BenchBot |
| Level of progress: | Text being edited 
|
| Notes: | Gathered and wikified using an automated tool. See this documentation for more information. |
Start a discussion about Walter v. Bickham/Opinion of the Court
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikisource the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Walter v. Bickham/Opinion of the Court.
