Tancil v. Woolls/Opinion of the Court
The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.
Notes
[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse