The Kernel and the Husk/Definitions
DEFINITIONS
i. Reality
ii. Force
"Imagined" is inserted, throughout these Definitions, as a reminder that the existence of all these objects of definition, however real, is suggested to us by the Imagination.
Why "immediately"? Because a particle of "matter"—attracting, as it does, every other particle of "matter"—may be said to "tend to produce motion." Yet "matter" is not said to be force, but to "exert" force. "Matter" is imagined to attract "matter" through the medium of force, or "mediately." But force is imagined to act "immediately." Hence the insertion of the word.
iii. Cause and Effect
iv. Spirit
v. Matter
The existence of Matter has never been proved; and it is nothing but a hypothesis. All the phenomena called "material" might be explained, without Matter, by the hypothesis of a number of centres of force. The raison d'être of Matter is the notion of tangibility. But scientific men now tell us that no atom ever touches another. If this be so, scientific tangibility disappears and the raison d'être of Matter disappears, with it. But it is so natural a figment that we shall all probably talk about it, and most of us probably will believe in it, until human nature is very much changed.
Matter cannot be defined positively except by repeating, in some disguise, the word to be defined, as thus:—
Material, or Matter, is a name given to an unascertained and hypothetical "material," "matter, "substance" or "fundamental stuff," of which we commonly imagine all objects of sensation to be composed.
vi. Nature
vii. Will
An addition might be suggested: "the power of controlling our desires." But we appear never to control our desires except by enthroning some one desire (or group of desires)—whether it be the desire to gain power, to ruin an enemy, to do right, or to serve God.
viii. Attention
ix. Memory
x. Imagination
xi. Reason
xii. Hope
xiii. Faith
The following Definition appears to me to be the basis of all theology. It is no more than an emphatic restatement of the old saying, "Faith is the assurance of (or giving substance to) things hoped for." Since hope is but a weaker and more hesitant form of desire, the imaging forth of (or giving substance to) things earnestly hoped for must imply the vivid imagination of the fulfilment of things desired.
"Faith in a friend" means a desire—as well as a belief—that he will do what you think he ought to do. "Faith" should never be used to express a belief that something undesirable or wrong will happen, e.g. "I have great faith that the boy will go wrong." "Faith" in the uniformity of Nature implies a desire that Nature should be uniform, and a feeling that it is God's will. In moments when we dread the uniformity of Nature we should say that we have a "conviction" or "expectation" of it, not that we have "faith" in it.
"Putting doubt at a distance is intended to include the different degrees of faith: in the highest faith, the "distance" is infinite.
"When "faith" is said to be "shaken," we may mean that, though the desire may remain, doubt is not "put at a distance;" or that the Conscience no longer approves of the desire; or that the desire itself is weakened.
xiv. Belief
xv. Certainty, or Conviction
xvi. Knowledge
xvii. Illusions and Delusions
THE END
RICHARD CLAY AND SONS, LONDON AND BUNGAY.
- ↑ Some might prefer "harmonize with experience or with fact." But "harmony with fact" can never be proved: you can only prove harmony with your experience, or with the general experience, of the fact; or with experience of what others say about the fact.