Jump to content

The Southern Presbyterian Journal/Volume 13/Number 37/The Law of God

From Wikisource
The Southern Presbyterian Journal, Volume 13, Number 37
Henry B. Dendy, Editor
"The Law of God" by Gordon H. Clark

For other articles in this series, see Articles on the Westminster Confession of Faith.

2289742The Southern Presbyterian Journal, Volume 13, Number 37 — "The Law of God" by Gordon H. ClarkHenry B. Dendy, Editor

Articles on the Westminster Confession
by Gordon H. Clark
The Word of God (WCF 1)
Creeds
Knowledge and Ignorance
The Trinity (WCF 2)
A Hard Saying (WCF 3)
Providence (WCF 5)
Creation (WCF 4)
Healthy, Sick, or Dead? (WCF 6)
The Covenant (WCF 7)
Christ the Mediator (WCF 8)
Justification (WCF 11)
Sanctification (WCF 13)
Free Will (WCF 9)
Effectual Calling (WCF 10)
Adoption (WCF 12)
The Law of God (WCF 19)
Assurance (WCF 18)
Saving Faith (WCF 14)
Repentance (WCF 15)
Good Works (WCF 16)
Christian Liberty (WCF 20)
Perseverance (WCF 17)
Worship and Vows (WCF 21, 22)
The Sacraments (WCF 27)
Baptism (WCF 28)
The Church (WCF 25)
The Civil Magistrate (WCF 23)
The Lord's Supper (WCF 29)
Censures and Councils (WCF 30, 31)
Resurrection and Judgment (WCF 32, 33)

A certain denomination, of which I am not a member, sponsored a Christmas service in which part of the worship was (what word shall I use?) performed by a troupe of ballet dancers. When I remarked, upon being pressed for an opinion, that ballet was a bit incongruous with divine worship, one of their ministers replied that any exercise that stimulates love of humanity is appropriate in church. Then I tried to tell him of the Puritan principle and of the law of God from which we should not turn aside, either to the right hand or to the left. And, since this minister expatiated on love versus law, I quoted "if ye love me, keep my commandments." But he concluded the conversation, politely enough, by saying that my viewpoint appeared legalistic to him.

The extreme modernists who introduce dancing into the worship service have strange allies in some fundamentalists who also reject the law of God. With all their insistence on the infallibility of the Scripture and on the necessity of Christ's death on the cross for our redemption—may God bless them abundantly, they are really Christians—this segment of fundamentalism denies that the Ten Commandments are binding in this age of the world's history. We are not under law but under grace, they say; we are free from the law and need pay no attention to it. To do so would be legalism.

Now, the three chapters of Romans where our freedom from the law of sin and death is most emphasized are far from disparaging the law. In addition to the strong insistence on the necessity of a righteous life (Rom. 6:2, 6, 12, 15; 8:1, 4, 13), Paul asserts that the law is holy and good (Rom. 7:12), spiritual (7:14), a delight to the godly man (7:22), and the rule of service (7:25). In most cases where the English translation speaks of being free from the law, the Greek more accurately says justified from the law. That is, we are free from the penalty of the law. It does not mean that we are free to disobey God's commands.

This is not legalism. Legalism, or justification by works, is the unscriptural teaching that man can merit heaven by his own efforts. And it is very strange that modernists, who have rejected the gracious sacrifice of Christ, should accuse anyone of being legalistic. But the meanings of words often get twisted these days, both in religion and in politics.

In opposition to legalism the Scriptures base our redemption solely on the merits of Christ. Yet, as we are redeemed from sin, as we come to Christ in repentance, as we are born to newness of life, we are under the same obligation to keep his laws. "If ye love me, keep my commandments."

The Confession of Faith sums up the whole matter very succinctly. After distinguishing the moral law from the ritual and the national laws, it says, (sections v, vi),

"The moral law doth forever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that not only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God, the Creator, who gave it. Neither doth Christ in the gospel any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.

"Although true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned; yet is it of great use to them, as well as to others; in that, as a rule of life, informing them of the will of God and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly; discovering also the sinful pollutions of their nature, hearts, and lives; so as, examining themselves thereby, they may come to further conviction of, humiliation for, and hatred against sin; together with a clearer sight of the need they have of Christ and the perfection of his obedience."