Jump to content

Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie

From Wikisource
Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie
Syllabus
942779Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie — Syllabus
Court Documents
Concurring Opinion
Harlan
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

402 U.S. 497

Triangle Improvement Council et al.  v.  Ritchie, Commissioner, State Road Commission of West Virginia, et al.

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

No. 712.  Argued: March 22, 1971 --- Decided: May 17, 1971

429 F. 2d 423, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.


Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, Elizabeth B. DuBois, and Thomas J. O'Sullivan.

William Bradford Reynolds argued the cause for the federal respondents pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Gray. Stanley E. Preiser argued the cause and filed a brief for the state respondents.

Kenneth E. Phillips filed a brief for the National Housing and Economic Development Law Project as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse