United States v. City of Chicago

←

Syllabus

→

940380United States v. City of Chicago — Syllabus

Court Documents

Per Curiam Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion: Harlan

United States Supreme Court

400 U.S. 8

United States et al. v. City of Chicago et al.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

No. 386.

Section 13a (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act does not require a railroad seeking to discontinue its segment of a through passenger train that is operated in conjunction with another railroad to give notice of the proposed discontinuance to States served only by the connecting line.

Nos. 386, 387, 396, and 410, 312 F. Supp. 442, reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

Notes

↑ Together with No. 387, United States et al. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., No. 396, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., and No. 410, Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad et al. v. City of Chicago et al., also on appeal from the same court.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

[ref1-1] Together with No. 387, United States et al. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., No. 396, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission et al., and No. 410, Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad et al. v. City of Chicago et al., also on appeal from the same court.