United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation

←

Syllabus

→

United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936), was a United States Supreme Court case involving principles of both governmental regulation of business and the supremacy of the executive branch of the federal government to conduct foreign affairs. Warning: template has been deprecated.

888259United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation — Syllabus

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

299 U.S. 304

United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation

Argued: Nov. 19, 20, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 21, 1936

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

[Syllabus from pages 304-306 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Martin Conboy, of New York City (Messrs. Stanley F. Reed, Sol. Gen., Brien McMahon, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William W. Barron and Charles A. Horsky, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for the United States.

Messrs. George Z. Medalie, J. Edward Lumbard, Jr., and Theodore S. Hope, Jr., all of New York City, for appellee Samuel J. Abelow.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse