Jump to content

United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs/Concurrence Stewart

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Harlan
Stewart
Dissenting Opinion
Black

United States Supreme Court

402 U.S. 363

United States  v.  Thirty-Seven Photographs

 Argued: Jan. 20, 1971. --- Decided: May 3, 1971


Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring in the judgment and in Part I of Mr. Justice WHITE'S opinion.

I agree that the First Amendment does not prevent the border seizure of obscene materials sought to be imported for commercial dissemination. For the reasons expressed in Part I of Mr. Justice WHITE'S opinion, I also agree that Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51, 85 S.Ct. 734, 13 L.Ed.2d 649, requires that there be time limits for the initiation of forfeiture proceedings and for the completion of the judicial determination of obscenity.

But I would not in this case decide, even by way of dicta, that the Government may lawfully seize literary material intended for the purely private use of the importer. [1] The terms of the statute appear to apply to an American tourist who, after exercising his constitutionally protected liberty to travel abroad, [2] returns home with a single book in his luggage, with no intention of selling it or otherwise using it, except to read it. If the Government can constitutionally take the book away from him as he passes through customs, then I do not understand the meaning of Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 89 S.Ct. 1243, 22 L.Ed.2d 542.

Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.

Notes

[edit]
  1. As Mr. Justice WHITE'S opinion correctly says, even if seizure of material for private use is unconstitutional, the statute can still stand in appropriately narrowed form, and the seizure in this case clearly falls within the valid sweep of such a narrowed statute. Ante, at 375, n. 3.
  2. Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500, 84 S.Ct. 1659, 12 L.Ed.2d 992.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse