User talk:Bookofjude/headerless

Use of category to exclude

Found a couple of pages where the text on the page is there to be transcluded into another part of the document. On those pages I have added a header and wrapped with <noinclude> and then added to the ignore list. Wondering whether it may be easier, wiser, or whateverer, to create a hidden category which we can add documents to be excluded, rather than have a running list. Thoughts? -- billinghurst (talk) 22:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Eligible for speedy delete?

1. Treatise on Law/Q100
2. Treatise on Law/Q101
3. Treatise on Law/Q102
4. Treatise on Law/Q103
5. Treatise on Law/Q104
6. Treatise on Law/Q105
7. Treatise on Law/Q106
8. Treatise on Law/Q107
9. Treatise on Law/Q108
10. Treatise on Law/Q90
11. Treatise on Law/Q91
12. Treatise on Law/Q92
13. Treatise on Law/Q93
14. Treatise on Law/Q94
15. Treatise on Law/Q95
16. Treatise on Law/Q96
17. Treatise on Law/Q97
18. Treatise on Law/Q98
19. Treatise on Law/Q99

Getting second opinion on what looks like a speedy delete on the grounds of duplication. See User_talk:GrafZahl#Treatise on Law and subpages and User_talk:Billinghurst#Treatise on Law Above files have not been touched in nearly three years, and they are duplicates of Treatise on Law where they are all on the one page. If there were to exist as dupes, then I would have thought that they would have been transcluded sections. -- billinghurst (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Templates to add as exclusions

Gday. For the next run rendition, it would be good if we could add the following templates to the exclusion list.

• {{Potus-eo}}

PING — billinghurst sDrewth 22:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

PLEASE!! — over 1,300 articles and growing daily. George Orwell III (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)