Jump to content

User talk:Damon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikisource
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Zhaladshar in topic Bot
Hello, Damon, welcome to Wikisource! Thanks for your interest in the project; we hope you'll enjoy the community and your work here. If you need help, see our help pages (especially Adding texts and Wikisource's style guide). You can discuss or ask questions from the community in general at the Scriptorium. The Community Portal lists tasks you can help with if you wish. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Letter Case of Topic Names

[edit]

Thank for your contributions of the Encyclopedia of Music. It is really great to see another encyclopedia project get started here. I would suggest that the article titles not be put in CAPS. Although that style was common in such books, all other encyclopedia projects here have converted the titles to the more readable (on a computer screen) style. Also I wanted to let you know we currently have a request in to have w:GNU LilyPond enabled here. It is not currently working but I though you might be interested to know it is in the works before you scan the entire encyclopedia.--BirgitteSB 18:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't know alot about music. Maybe we can ask someone else about which way they should be. I know someone knowledgable to ask. About Lilypond. This is a website [1] and here is a quick look at the code and the output [2] It supposedly will give a midi as well but I don't know if that will be installed here. --BirgitteSB 18:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just go ahead with lowercase that is fine :) --BirgitteSB 18:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

HI Damon. Great work on the music encyclopedia, but you should probably use upper case-lower case (such as Abel, J.E.) for names. In general, terms shoudl start with caps. Danny 19:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Damon, sorry about adding yet another comment to your talk page. We all are VERY glad that you're working on another encyclopedia project, and I would have one favor to ask. This is in line with Danny's comment above. But, for all page names, could you just capitalize the first letter of each word? This would take care of capitalizing all names and all terms, and is more in line with how all of our other encyclopedia projects work. Thanks! I'll come thought (assuming no one beats me to it) and delete all the redirects from the page moves. If I get time later today, I'll even help with the moves myself.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 20:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi, again.
I'm not sure how far (if at all) you've come with page moves, but I BELIEVE there is a quick and easy way to do the moves all at once. It will require regex to do. Pathoschild wrote a script that can do mass page moves, and with the right regex statement, we should be able to get the first letter of each word capitalized. If not, well, I've got plenty of free time tomorrow to do page moves/deletes.  :)
About using bots to bulk update/mirror content here, I'm not the most knowledgable person about this. You might try asking Pathoschild. We've got a number of bots working here on WS, but I don't know how many are based off Pywikipedia or are just scripts thrown together by the users (I believe a number of the bots are mixtures of the two). Again, though, that would be a question for Pathoschild.
Hope this helps. Feel free to ask me any other questions you might have.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 20:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just a follow up to my last comment. All the pages will be moved and the first letter of all the articles will be capitalized. This will cover most of the articles. All proper nouns we will have to move manually as the script won't cover those items.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Encyclopedia edits

[edit]

That's okay!  :-)

Could you change your script though, so that the two parameters "section=" and "notes=" are included when you add the pages? Even if nothing occupies those parameters, they should at least still be present in case other users have something to add to them. Thanks!—Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. I think I'm about a third of the way through the page moves. I should be done within the next week (I'm pretty busy right now, otherwise they'd be done sooner).

Bot

[edit]

Hi, Damon,

In accordance with our bot policy, I must ask that you request a bot account for your script. Otherwise it will flood RC with a bunch of edits that will push out other edits by users who aren't using automated scripts.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 01:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're right, you didn't mislead anyone. You were very upfront about it, and there's really no problem. It's common on these projects that if people are using automated scripts on non-bot accounts they have very long periods in between the script edits--which is the biggest issue right now. With the current 10 second intervals, in just a mere matter of minutes, RC will be flooded by automated updates. This keeps people from patrolling the RC to make sure that there isn't any vandalism in the edits that are strictly human edits. And while this isn't an issue, just a suggestion. Since you are working very quickly (and with massive amounts of changes that are made to the pages), it is necessary to have a bot account to do it so that the changes can be hidden from the RC.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 02:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply