Van Weel v. Winston

←

Van Weel v. Winston
by Samuel Freeman Miller

Syllabus

→

795234Van Weel v. Winston — SyllabusSamuel Freeman Miller

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

Van Weel v. Winston

Argued: November 2, 1885. ---

[Syllabus from pages 228-229 intentionally omitted]

[Statement of Case from pages 229-234 intentionally omitted]

J. K. Edsall and W. H. Moore, for appellant.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 234-236 intentionally omitted]

M. W. Fuller and W. C. Goudy, for appellees.

MILLER, J.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse