Wallace v. Cutten

←

Wallace v. Cutten
by Louis Brandeis

Syllabus

→

Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the authority of the United States Secretary of Agriculture under the Grain Futures Act (298 U.S. 229, 235) was limited to prevent continued violation of the act, not past violations. Warning: template has been deprecated.

887804Wallace v. Cutten — SyllabusLouis Brandeis

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

Wallace v. Cutten

Argued: April 27, 1936. --- Decided: May 18, 1936

Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Wendell Berge, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 230-233 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse