Webster and Hayne's Celebrated Speeches
WEBSTER AND HAYNE’S
CELEBRATED
SPEECHES
IN THE
UNITED STATES SENATE,
ON
MR. FOOT’S RESOLUTION
OF
JANUARY, 1830.
ALSO,
DANIEL WEBSTER’S SPEECH IN THE SENATE OF
THE UNITED STATES, MAY 7, 1850, ON
THE SLAVERY COMPROMISE.
“When my eyes shall be turned to behold, for the last time, the sun in heaven, may I not see him shining on the broken and dishonored fragments of a once glorious Union; on States dissevered, discordant, belligerent; on a land rent with civil feuds, or drenched, it may be, in fraternal blood!” “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable.”—Daniel Webster.
“We ask nothing of our northern brethren but to ‘let us alone.’ Leave us to the undisturbed management of our domestic concerns, and the direction of our own industry, and we will ask no more.” “Sir, there have existed, in every age and every country, two distinct orders of men—the lovers of freedom, and the devoted advocates of power.”—Colonel Hayne, of S. C.
Philadelphia:
T. B. PETERSON AND BROTHERS,
306 CHESTNUT STREET.
PREFACE.
One or two preliminary remarks upon the establishment of the administrations of 1825 and 1829 may render some of the allusions in these speeches more intelligible to those readers who are not familiar with the political history of the day.
The election of a President of the United States for the term beginning March 4, 1825, devolved upon the House of Representatives. The whole electoral vote was 261—of which Andrew Jackson had 99, John Quincy Adams 84, William H. Crawford 41, and Henry Clay 37. The house, by the constitution, was limited to the first three in making a choice, and the vote was by states. Until the election actually took place, there was much doubt as to the result, but on the first ballot Adams received the votes of thirteen states, Jackson seven, and Crawford four; and Adams was thus elected. The vote was so close, however, that a rumor was put in circulation of a corrupt understanding between Adams and Clay, by which the friends of the latter, who was not a constitutional candidate, voted for Adams, in consideration of the bestowal of the office of secretary of state upon Clay by Adams in forming his cabinet. This calumny was disproved by all the testimony which could be brought to bear upon a negative proposition; and although at present it is probably not credited by any body, the suspicion of such a “coalition” seriously affected the popularity of both Adams and Clay at the time, and Colonel Hayne in his speech alluded to it, intimating that Webster had hopes of the office of secretary of state himself, which were frustrated by the appointment of Clay.
At the next presidential election, that of 1828, Adams and Jackson were opposing candidates, and the latter was chosen by a large popular majority. This result was brought about by the active coöperation with Jackson’s original supporters of the friends of Mr. Calhoun and many of the friends of the other candidates of 1824. This coöperation implied the combination of the most discordant materials. The friends of Calhoun generally gave their aid, in the expectation that their favorite would be the next candidate, and in this way would receive the support of Jackson’s other present supporters. How unfounded was any such expectation was proved by the actual result, by which Jackson was elected for a second term, and after him Van Buren, Calhoun being entirely neglected. It was in prophecy of this result that Mr. Webster quoted Shakspeare to the Vice President, Calhoun, reminding him that those who had foully removed Banquo had placed
“A barren sceptre in their gripe,
Thence to be wrenched by an unlineal hand,
No son of theirs succeeding.”
Although at the time of the speech there was the most perfect cordiality between Jackson and Calhoun and their friends and supporters.
Mr. Hayne's Speech on Mr. Foot's Resolution (1830)
Mr. Webster's Speech on Mr. Foot's Resolution (1830)
Mr. Webster's Speech on the Slavery Compromise (1850)